Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I am tempted to close this issue. We try to smooth out the grade since the
elevation data we get back from the location provider is really noisy. The
reason that the data is not always the same is that we do throw out the noisest
data we get back.
Original comment by sandordo...@google.com
on 16 Nov 2010 at 5:50
Hello,
Another possible approach to computing the grade comes to mind. Your plot
of elevation profile appears to be very smooth without any obvious anomalies
or deviations from the true grade of the course. Would it be possible to
compute grade from the same array that is used to produce the elevation
plot? It appears that adequate smoothing and elimination of anomalies has
been accomplished in the data that is used to generate the plot.
Original comment by tgoh...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2010 at 3:11
Ok I'll leave it open to reflect that we could do better at detecting the
grade. I think using the elevation plot would be a mistake as that samples too
aggressively, but we might want to look at computing the grade over locations
that are at least n meters appart instead of looking at sequential points.
Original comment by sandordo...@google.com
on 18 Nov 2010 at 4:12
Let me know if I can help by sharing any specific data sets with you. I
have one cycling course that has a known set of highway grades on it; and I
can share multiple passes of this course if that would be of help.
Thanks for the efforts!
-Tom Gohl
Original comment by tgoh...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2010 at 4:19
Original comment by sandordo...@google.com
on 25 Feb 2011 at 6:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tgoh...@gmail.com
on 3 Nov 2010 at 2:12