Closed IPvSean closed 3 years ago
for some reason i am not collecting all information that is configured on my IOS-XE router......
this is how i collect->
--- - name: gather cisco ios facts cisco.ios.facts: gather_subset: config gather_network_resources: "{{ network_resource | default('!vlans') }}"
ios_bgp_address_family
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/collections/cisco/ios/ios_bgp_address_family_module.html
details: core 2.11.2
ee-supported-rhel8
which contains
--- ansible: collections: details: amazon.aws: 1.5.0 ansible.controller: 4.0.0 ansible.netcommon: 2.2.0 ansible.network: 1.0.1 ansible.posix: 1.2.0 ansible.security: 1.0.0 ansible.utils: 2.3.0 ansible.windows: 1.5.0 arista.eos: 2.2.0 cisco.asa: 2.0.2 cisco.ios: 2.3.0 cisco.iosxr: 2.3.0 cisco.nxos: 2.4.0 cloud.common: 2.0.3 frr.frr: 1.0.3 ibm.qradar: 1.0.3 junipernetworks.junos: 2.2.0 kubernetes.core: 2.1.1 openvswitch.openvswitch: 2.0.0 redhat.insights: 1.0.5 redhat.openshift: 2.0.1 redhat.rhel_system_roles: 1.0.1 redhat.rhv: 1.4.4 redhat.satellite: 2.0.1 servicenow.itsm: 1.1.0 splunk.es: 1.0.2 trendmicro.deepsec: 1.1.0 vmware.vmware_rest: 2.0.0 vyos.vyos: 2.3.1 version: details: core 2.11.2
N/A, using EE
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.4 (Ootpa)
BGP config on IOS-XE
rtr1#sh run | s router bgp router bgp 65000 bgp router-id 192.168.1.1 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 10.200.200.2 remote-as 65001 neighbor 10.200.200.2 ebgp-multihop 255 ! address-family ipv4 network 10.10.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 network 10.100.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 10.200.200.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 redistribute ospf 1 neighbor 10.200.200.2 activate exit-address-family
would also have->
and have those as key,value paris in structured data... see below they are missing from the output.... it is very strange
"ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.as_number": "65000", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].afi": "ipv4", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[0].address": "10.100.100.0", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[0].mask": "255.255.255.0", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[1].address": "10.200.200.0", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[1].mask": "255.255.255.0", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[2].address": "172.16.0.0", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[3].address": "192.168.1.1", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].network[3].mask": "255.255.255.255", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].neighbor[0].address": "10.200.200.2", "ansible_facts.ansible_network_resources.bgp_address_family.address_family[0].neighbor[0].activate": true,
here is the structured data not flattened->
"bgp_address_family": { "as_number": "65000", "address_family": [ { "afi": "ipv4", "network": [ { "address": "10.100.100.0", "mask": "255.255.255.0" }, { "address": "10.200.200.0", "mask": "255.255.255.0" }, { "address": "172.16.0.0" }, { "address": "192.168.1.1", "mask": "255.255.255.255" } ], "neighbor": [ { "address": "10.200.200.2", "activate": true } ] } ] },
@IPvSean @KB-perByte This might be related to: https://github.com/ansible-collections/cisco.ios/issues/392
SUMMARY
for some reason i am not collecting all information that is configured on my IOS-XE router......
this is how i collect->
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
ios_bgp_address_family
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/collections/cisco/ios/ios_bgp_address_family_module.html
ANSIBLE VERSION
COLLECTION VERSION
which contains
CONFIGURATION
OS / ENVIRONMENT
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.4 (Ootpa)
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
BGP config on IOS-XE
EXPECTED RESULTS
would also have->
and have those as key,value paris in structured data... see below they are missing from the output.... it is very strange
ACTUAL RESULTS
here is the structured data not flattened->