Add project_name parameter to the kubernetes module

[raman-babich]

SUMMARY

Fixes #264

ISSUE TYPE

• Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

digital_ocean_kubernetes

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (23f775f) 62.52% compared to head (91b350e) 62.81%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_kubernetes.py	58.82%	5 Missing and 2 partials :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #333 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 62.52% 62.81% +0.29% ========================================== Files 46 46 Lines 3602 3617 +15 Branches 738 743 +5 ========================================== + Hits 2252 2272 +20 + Misses 1059 1050 -9 - Partials 291 295 +4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.digitalocean/pull/333/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.digitalocean/pull/333/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | `65.41% <35.29%> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: | | [sanity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.digitalocean/pull/333/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | `26.01% <0.00%> (-0.11%)` | :arrow_down: | | [units](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.digitalocean/pull/333/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | `60.64% <23.52%> (-1.71%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mamercad]

Try rebasing because of #335 please.

[mamercad]

@raman-babich apologies for pushing to your branch; I'm in the process of refactoring the integration testing workflows (and having this PR open is helping me). I've reworked the integration testing workflows to matrix over the various modules (versus having all of their outputs in a single pass). There are quite a few modules in this collection at this point, and although the output in the PR becomes very noisy, it's helpful to be able to quickly figure out which module(s) are failing.