codecov[bot]
commented
8 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
33793df) 66.16% compared to head (38a21ef) 66.16%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #172 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 66.16% 66.16% ======================================= Files 12 12 Lines 990 990 Branches 231 231 ======================================= Hits 655 655 Misses 255 255 Partials 80 80 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.sops/pull/172/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.sops/pull/172/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | `65.06% <ø> (ø)` | | | [sanity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ansible-collections/community.sops/pull/172/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections) | `22.82% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ansible-collections#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
SUMMARY
Now that antsibull-changelog allows to create a MarkDown changelog, let's use that. Also because GitHub screwed up RST rendering, and while it still works for this collection, who knows for how much longer...
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
changelog