Closed abadger closed 7 years ago
Re-migrated ansible/ansible#19016
Merged to devel
Re-moved ansible/ansible#19070 win_file: fix error when creating an existing dir
ansible/ansible#15432 "Ansible 2.0 no longer finds modules in library subdirectories"
Merged
Discuss extending the module "shipit" workflow to non-modules, such as:
Update 12 Jan 2017 Meeting
Update 9th Feb 2017 Meeting For contrib/inventory
Feb 21 Meeting
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19500 Update assemble to allow alternate source of files
Decision made to reject this new feature. abadger to update the ticket.
feature proposal: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19707 (enhanced rolling updates)
Jan 10 meeting: bcoca was for a sorting and grouping of hosts independent of serial.
Jan 31 meeting: podlesh has some examples of use case that don't seem to be solvable by merely enhancing sorting and grouping independent of serial. bcoca and jimi-c not present. Will discuss at meeting feb 7
Feb 7 meeting: Discussed how to perform examples without serial_group_by... seemed possible but rather complex. After more discussion we decided that this may be a mismatch of feature and existing concept. Advised looking into implementing this as a strategy plugin rather than a new play-level keyword. There were some reservations about whether we'd accept that into the core codebase either but outlook for it was better (a plugin is isolated whereas a keyword's code is present for everyone) and a plugin can also be shipped via a role on galaxy if it is not accepted.
We decided to reject this new feature. abadger will close out the ticket.
From @jtyr: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19283 hosts module (for /etc/hosts)
2017-02-09
<@bcoca> -1 < thaumos> -1 imo, a module like this is redundant. There's template or lineinfile (which I dread). <@rcarrillocruz> -1, imho modules should be base building blocks, tthere are enough foundations to do this with a role and/or current modules <@jtanner> -1 because i don't want to deal with all the tickets complaining about $ODDBALL_HOSTS _SCHEMA < allanice001> -1 (non-core vote) < akasivel> -1 I don't believe it necessary and I personally wouldn't use it. (none-core vote)
<@mattclay>+0 I see a little benefit of the validation, but it's not much more than just template/lineinfile < shertel> +0 <@gundalow> +0 For the points that jtanner said, though I think it has some use
abadger1999 +1
< albertom> +1 while line in file does the job, i etc_hosts saves me from the regex jtyr +1 (the creater
-1:5, 0:3, +1:1, so this module was not accepted for merge due to redundancy with template and concerns about cross-platform maintainability. can still be hosted on galaxy (and hopefully we'll have a time frame for when ansible-installer can make things hosted on galaxy more discoverable).
From luto: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19297 Fix for wildcards inside of a path for fileglob lookup (ie: with_fileglob: "/tmp/*/some.conf"
)
From bcoca: Decide which are valid directives on include (for execution or inheritance) and what to do when we decide they are not. This issue deals with one case, but i think we should deal with it in general https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/20440
also document once decided so users KNOW what to expect
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
From rfleschenberg versioned docs Summarizing previous discussion
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/20058 Add systemd-nspawn connection driver
Define and document proposals process i.e https://github.com/ansible/proposals/issues/50 was created and 'agreed' to immediately, w/o giving time for community feedback, which is happening now after implementation.
We might need to review/update this: https://github.com/ansible/proposals/blob/master/proposals_process_proposal.md
7 Feb Meeting
Discussed at the meeting. Many problems with the meta-proposal for creating proposals were discussed. Minimum timeframes were proposed but no agreement could be come to. Proposal documenting the new proposal process was asked for.
14 Feb Meeting
allanice001
has kindly offered to raise a PR to update proposals_process_proposal.md
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
@bcoca Yeah, such process would be really useful because I'm not happy about the result of the Proposal #50 at all ;o(
Not an agenda item
@jtyr this is not a revision on that decision (I suggest you open your own agenda item for that) but on the process that should be followed on proposals and the time needed to allow for community feedback.
Not an agenda item
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/13206
This PR was discussed at length internally and we couldn't come to an agreement one way or another, so putting it on the agenda for wider discussion. I'll try to summarize some of the key points of the discussion here:
Apologies if I missed any key points from the discussion, it ran over the course of ~1 hour.
Rejected by vote of -4 +2 Use the work-around provided in the PR comments.
Minuites for today's meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-07/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-07-19.00.html
I'd like to discuss ansible/ansible#19264. "Added in bullet of Python 2.4+ support discontinuation"
Merged
I would like to discuss https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/20834
my irc nick is Add swupd plugin
albertom
Discussed 9th Feb 2017
ACTION: bcoca (if he has time) to review the code. albertom knows we are close to the 2.3 cut off, so we can't guarantee it will make it in for 2.3 ACTION: albertom to review feedback from meeting, continue discussion in #ansible-devel
MERGED
I would like to discuss https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/20703 Fixing broken bind mount on CentOS 7
Edit: Discussed in the #ansible channel with @abadger and it seems to be "good to go".
2017-02-09
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-09/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-09-15.00.html https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-09/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-09-15.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-09/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-09-15.00.log.html
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/18453 "pycrypto not listed in the Python package requirements list"
How do we:
14 Feb Meeting
Post meeting https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/21430 "Move to using a requirements.txt to install the python packages. " was merged
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/21299 Add "idempotence check" section to module docs
14th Feb Meeting
gundalow
to add some words to developing_modules_documenting.html's notes: regarding "for example if check_mode is only supported with some 2017-02-14
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-14/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-14-19.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-14/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-14-19.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-meeting/2017-02-14/ansible_core_meeting.2017-02-14-19.00.log.html
Can we merge wait_for_connection action plugin ? ansible/ansible#20011
16th Feb Meeting
Has been merged
Facts modules not using ansible_fact
argument to exit_json
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/19910#issuecomment-278496104
16th Feb Meeting
Will be tracked via proposal
How to get this going: ansible/community#152 Windows Working Group
16th Feb Meeting
21 Feb Meeting
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/21764 CyberArk Initial Support
IRC nickname is enunez-cyberark
Has been reviewed waiting on updates. Will now follow standard review process
I would like to discuss https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/20405 (win_copy: Add force parameter and check-mode support), specifically to see if we can
Merged, no further discussion needed
Ansible Core 2.1.5RC1 and 2.2.2RC1 are available for testing https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/VnHIVtzuyzs
I'd like to discuss https://github.com/ansible/proposals/issues/14 Proposal: Module Rename Lifecycle
IRC nick == ryansb
I would like to discuss
I would like to discuss what the process is when
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
I think a new discussion is in order on how to tackle the "modules are used for adding, changing, removing and giving information about an object".
Discussion triggered by: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/20399#pullrequestreview-18432297
We have modules that allow state=list (or state=info), other (sets of) modules have _facts or _stat variants and here the contributor was requested to leave it out and assume that an undefined "state" means returning information, rather than making changes.
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
Related to https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/21874 we disabled the standard expanduser/expandvars in a lot of internal module_utils functions. And it appeared that (at least) none of the integration tests rely on this specific expanding of user/vars of paths. Since we usually expand directly as part of processing parameters, it seems we don't actually need this on different levels (and in the case of unarchive in this specific case it was undesirable and potentially a security problem).
The question being: can we get rid of these expanduser/expandvars calls here ? And if so, what's the process to get it done.
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
Update to the metadata format: https://github.com/ansible/proposals/issues/54
Want to update the metadata format prior to 2.3 to get rid of some warts that have been identified post-implementation.
Migrated to https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156
Open items have been moved to March's agenda https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/156 Windows Community is up and running, please see https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/153
Please leave a comment regarding any agenda item you wish to discuss. If you don't show up for the meeting, your item will be skipped.
If your IRC nick is different from your Github username, leave that as well.
See https://github.com/ansible/community/blob/master/meetings/README.md for the schedule
Once an item has been addressed it should get
strike-though~~strike-though~~