Please make sure this box is checked before submitting your issue - thank you!
[x] Issue is related to guides or validation part of EHF in post-award.
Issues related to PEPPOL BIS or rules part of PEPPOL BIS must be sent to rfc@peppol.eu.
Your issue here:
We would like to suggest that on the Dispatch Advice (DA [ASN]) message, the order reference at the header level be made non-mandatory, and to introduce an order (header) reference field at the DA line level.
We have multiple use cases where we are sending goods for multiple orders in the same shipment – either because the shipment represents a “back order” delivery that can span outstanding deliveries from several orders, or because the shipment can be a collated shipment to central receiving for orders from several departments.
This has been declined by OpenPEPPOL; however the first item (non-mandatory at header level) comes from EHF as it's not mandatory in OpenPEPPOL. I think the correct reference is EHF-T16-B15402 - Element 'cac:OrderReference' MUST be provided.
Please make sure this box is checked before submitting your issue - thank you!
Issues related to PEPPOL BIS or rules part of PEPPOL BIS must be sent to rfc@peppol.eu.
Your issue here:
We would like to suggest that on the Dispatch Advice (DA [ASN]) message, the order reference at the header level be made non-mandatory, and to introduce an order (header) reference field at the DA line level.
We have multiple use cases where we are sending goods for multiple orders in the same shipment – either because the shipment represents a “back order” delivery that can span outstanding deliveries from several orders, or because the shipment can be a collated shipment to central receiving for orders from several departments.
This has been declined by OpenPEPPOL; however the first item (non-mandatory at header level) comes from EHF as it's not mandatory in OpenPEPPOL. I think the correct reference is EHF-T16-B15402 - Element 'cac:OrderReference' MUST be provided.