Closed hiyijian closed 8 years ago
Yes, I think that is a mistake! Sorry... my calibration models were trained improperly, and I currently haven't found time to train them correctly, but I have fixed the training .prototxt files.
Previous ROC results on the FDDB were about 10% lower than the original work, but I think fixing the calibration models will reduce the difference.
sorry, I didnt see any change in training .prototxt.
The train_val.prototxt files of the calibration nets in CNN_face_detection_models were changed to have a false mirror property in the data layer.
yes. I noticed that issuse you guys discussed previously. One more question please: line 560-563 in face_detection/face_detection_functions.py, both current_x and current_y time 2, why is that? As far as I am concerned, current_x and current_y are exactly the coord of top-left corner of the proposed window. there is no need to times 2?
The 2 corresponds to the pooling layer of the first 12 net, since the pooling layer scales the input image down by a factor of 2.
thank you
line 60-62 after calling detect_face_12c_net, no sort by confidence, then call LocalNMS which require input bboxes are sorted by confidence
is that a bug?
And would you please to share ROC on benchmark?