Open germa89 opened 1 year ago
Also add:
mapdl.port
mapdl.exited
mapdl.check_status
mapdl.ip
I really feel that the SOLVE command needs to be left alone:
1) MAPDL already has heurestics built in to set some solution settings based on model type and features. I don't know that PyMAPDL needs to add to these.
2) It's not always correct to turn on large deformation, even with models with contact. At the very least it's hard to show the benefit of large deformation if we can't turn it off!
@mikerife what if it just printed out some suggestions, rather than throwing any error or changing the behavior of solve?
Care should be used when looking at adding a warning to multiple ET commands using the same ET ID. Reusing ET IDs is standard procedure in one way load coupled multiphysics models. It can also be SOP when using the MESH200 elements. Maybe an option to turn on 'enhanced warnings' that would pick up this type of usage?
@koubaa that a good idea (printing suggestions)!
mapdl.vplot
has wrong argument "show_numbering" and it plots areas.mapdl.aplot
are wrong. There is an issue for this.
@germa89 @mikerife This issue suggests possible improvements that could be made to pymapdl:
def _validate_solve(self):
activate nlgeom if contact is involved.