The data presents a comparison of the performance of three CSS-in-JS libraries: Styled Components, Emotion, and Antd (cssInJS). The performance is measured in two ways, the percentage of components that are successfully rendered and the total blocking time.
In terms of the percentage of components that are successfully rendered, the results are similar for the three libraries. As the number of components increases, the performance decreases for all three libraries. Styled Components and Emotion have a relatively higher performance compared to Antd cssInJS, especially at lower component numbers. For example, when the number of components is 10, Styled Components and Emotion have a performance of 97% and 96% respectively, while Antd cssInJS has a performance of only 90%.
In terms of total blocking time, the results show a clear difference between the three libraries. As the number of components increases, the total blocking time of Styled Components and Emotion increases at a slower pace compared to Antd cssInJS. For example, when the number of components is 200, the total blocking time of Styled Components is 350, Emotion is 450, while Antd cssInJS is 2450. This suggests that Styled Components and Emotion might be more suitable options for projects that require low total blocking time.
Total blocking time of Styled Components and Emotion also increases with increasing component numbers. At the highest number of components (5000), the total blocking time of Styled Components is 4540, Emotion is 5500, while Antd cssInJS's total blocking time is not possible to calculate.
CSS-in-Js performance testing
The data presents a comparison of the performance of three CSS-in-JS libraries: Styled Components, Emotion, and Antd (cssInJS). The performance is measured in two ways, the percentage of components that are successfully rendered and the total blocking time.
In terms of the percentage of components that are successfully rendered, the results are similar for the three libraries. As the number of components increases, the performance decreases for all three libraries. Styled Components and Emotion have a relatively higher performance compared to Antd cssInJS, especially at lower component numbers. For example, when the number of components is 10, Styled Components and Emotion have a performance of 97% and 96% respectively, while Antd cssInJS has a performance of only 90%.
In terms of total blocking time, the results show a clear difference between the three libraries. As the number of components increases, the total blocking time of Styled Components and Emotion increases at a slower pace compared to Antd cssInJS. For example, when the number of components is 200, the total blocking time of Styled Components is 350, Emotion is 450, while Antd cssInJS is 2450. This suggests that Styled Components and Emotion might be more suitable options for projects that require low total blocking time.
Total blocking time of Styled Components and Emotion also increases with increasing component numbers. At the highest number of components (5000), the total blocking time of Styled Components is 4540, Emotion is 5500, while Antd cssInJS's total blocking time is not possible to calculate.
PR: https://github.com/SmashTaps/css-in-js-solution-evaluation/pull/1#issue-1561476489
React version : "^18.2.0" AntD version : "^5.1.6" Emotion : "^11.10.5" Styled-component version : ^5.3.6"
Tested PC
Processor 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-11300H @ 3.10GHz 2.61 GHz Installed RAM 16.0 GB System type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor