Open sgbaird opened 2 years ago
Also, the CrabNet paper reports an even lower error for the matbench_expt_gap
task (0.338 eV
) than what's shown in the matbench
submission (0.3463 eV
). Maybe it is just that I didn't run it for enough epochs. Ran it for 100 epochs and got 0.3485 eV
.
I think I was using a fresh clone of CrabNet, but this would probably need to be verified.
@MahamadSalah74 I ran the matbench notebook posted on the matbench GitHub page (https://github.com/materialsproject/matbench/pull/23), and got somewhat higher MAEs for a few repeat runs (see below) compared to what was reported.
The reported matbench result (
0.3463
) seems a bit more in line withmatbench_crabnet.py
which uses 300 epochs and the full train/val dataset for training. It's not a huge difference, but I'm trying to figure out if/what the discrepancy is.Maybe I'm missing something basic. Could you comment on this?