There are three categories for standard oracle SQL functions (not java): string functions, numeric functions and other functions. I think that some functions are misplaced into string functions. Like for example NVL.
Lots of function keywords are not categorized at all.
My question is: Would it be a good idea to redo the parser function categorization and use Oracle's own categorization as much as possible. It can be found at this URL: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/sqlrf/Single-Row-Functions.html
There are three categories for standard oracle SQL functions (not java): string functions, numeric functions and other functions. I think that some functions are misplaced into string functions. Like for example NVL. Lots of function keywords are not categorized at all. My question is: Would it be a good idea to redo the parser function categorization and use Oracle's own categorization as much as possible. It can be found at this URL: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/sqlrf/Single-Row-Functions.html