Closed kaby76 closed 1 week ago
Consider input SELECT 1 * 2 ^ 3 + 4;. This is parsed in two ways.
SELECT 1 * 2 ^ 3 + 4;
$ trparse -i 'SELECT 1 * 2 ^ 3 + 4;' --ambig | trtree -a CSharp 0 string success 0.1303192 (root (stmtblock (stmtmulti (stmt (selectstmt (select_no_parens (select_clause (simple_select_intersect (simple_select_pramary (SELECT "SELECT") (target_list_ (target_list (target_el (a_expr (a_expr_qual (a_expr_lessless (a_expr_or (a_expr_and (a_expr_between (a_expr_in (a_expr_unary_not (a_expr_isnull (a_expr_is_not (a_expr_compare (a_expr_like (a_expr_qual_op (a_expr_unary_qualop (a_expr_add (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "1"))))))))) (STAR "*") (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "2")))))))) (CARET "^") (a_expr (a_expr_qual (a_expr_lessless (a_expr_or (a_expr_and (a_expr_between (a_expr_in (a_expr_unary_not (a_expr_isnull (a_expr_is_not (a_expr_compare (a_expr_like (a_expr_qual_op (a_expr_unary_qualop (a_expr_add (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "3")))))))))) (PLUS "+") (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "4"))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) (SEMI ";"))) (EOF "")) (root (stmtblock (stmtmulti (stmt (selectstmt (select_no_parens (select_clause (simple_select_intersect (simple_select_pramary (SELECT "SELECT") (target_list_ (target_list (target_el (a_expr (a_expr_qual (a_expr_lessless (a_expr_or (a_expr_and (a_expr_between (a_expr_in (a_expr_unary_not (a_expr_isnull (a_expr_is_not (a_expr_compare (a_expr_like (a_expr_qual_op (a_expr_unary_qualop (a_expr_add (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "1"))))))))) (STAR "*") (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "2")))))))) (CARET "^") (a_expr (a_expr_qual (a_expr_lessless (a_expr_or (a_expr_and (a_expr_between (a_expr_in (a_expr_unary_not (a_expr_isnull (a_expr_is_not (a_expr_compare (a_expr_like (a_expr_qual_op (a_expr_unary_qualop (a_expr_add (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "3"))))))))))))))))))))))))))) (PLUS "+") (a_expr_mul (a_expr_caret (a_expr_unary_sign (a_expr_at_time_zone (a_expr_collate (a_expr_typecast (c_expr (aexprconst (iconst (Integral "4")))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) (SEMI ";"))) (EOF ""))
There should not be any ambiguity with these operators.
The Floyd grammar refactoring for expressions doesn't follow the usual way you do this. I'll have to correct it.
Fixed.
Consider input
SELECT 1 * 2 ^ 3 + 4;
. This is parsed in two ways.There should not be any ambiguity with these operators.