There are various instances in the corpus where there are notations of the form (CONJ og-og-og). These can occur with three to five "og"s. Are these somehow reflecting something in the source text, or are they the result of some sort of script that went haywire?
There are various instances in the corpus where there are notations of the form
(CONJ og-og-og)
. These can occur with three to five "og"s. Are these somehow reflecting something in the source text, or are they the result of some sort of script that went haywire?