Open brantlymillegan opened 3 years ago
let recoveredAddress = recoverAddress(arrayify(hashMessage(data)), signature);
This is under the assumption that the address is EOA. Can we make use of ERC1271 which supports contract-based accounts?
https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-valid-signature is a library that abstracted the logic. It works on most contract-based accounts except Gnosis Safe which hasn't supported ERC1271 yet.
const resolverAddress = "0x3671aE578E63FdF66ad4F3E12CC0c0d71Ac7510C"; const addresses = ['0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045', '0x983110309620d911731ac0932219af06091b6744']
Looks like 0x3671.. is ReverseRecord contract which I deployed a while back. Even though I understand that this will help looking up multiple names in one function call, isn't it irrelevant to the specification?
ReverseRecord
This is under the assumption that the address is EOA. Can we make use of ERC1271 which supports contract-based accounts?
https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-valid-signature is a library that abstracted the logic. It works on most contract-based accounts except Gnosis Safe which hasn't supported ERC1271 yet.
Looks like 0x3671.. is
ReverseRecordcontract which I deployed a while back. Even though I understand that this will help looking up multiple names in one function call, isn't it irrelevant to the specification?