Closed jose1711 closed 9 months ago
Thank you! I'll test it a bit, and then I'll merge it to main. I wonder if we should keep both systems as alternatives because for different people ics parsing it is not always working well, depending on the specific fields etc. Also, there are some protective checks and error catches in the code specific to ics library issues, maybe we can get rid of them as well.
rebased on top of main
I wonder if we should keep both systems as alternatives because for different people ics parsing it is not always working well, depending on the specific fields etc.
Is there a concrete example where icalendar
performs worse than ics
module?
Not really, no. That's why for now I merged as is, just replacing the whole system. It's just previously when we introduced ics parsing, there were bunch of people who had strange issues. Anyways, let's publish version 3.0 with icalendar and see if anyone complains.
Fixes #66