I don't use bucklescript, and I'm not sure if the current setup (added as part of https://github.com/anuragsoni/routes/pull/104) is relevant to the current landscape of bucklescript/reason/rescript. I've removed the npm publishing setup for now, and i'm leaning towards removing the bucklescript packaging setup entirely due to unfamiliarity with the ecosystem, and the fact that I always need to manually fix something for it every time I cut a release (mostly because I often forget about bucklescript packaging since I never use it).
If someone is actually using the bucklescript support for a project and would like to continue using this library, reach out and I'll be happy to work together to get the packaging sorted out. But failing that, 0.9 is probably the last version of routes that will be published for bucklescript (on npm or otherwise).
I don't use bucklescript, and I'm not sure if the current setup (added as part of https://github.com/anuragsoni/routes/pull/104) is relevant to the current landscape of bucklescript/reason/rescript. I've removed the npm publishing setup for now, and i'm leaning towards removing the bucklescript packaging setup entirely due to unfamiliarity with the ecosystem, and the fact that I always need to manually fix something for it every time I cut a release (mostly because I often forget about bucklescript packaging since I never use it).
If someone is actually using the bucklescript support for a project and would like to continue using this library, reach out and I'll be happy to work together to get the packaging sorted out. But failing that, 0.9 is probably the last version of routes that will be published for bucklescript (on npm or otherwise).