Closed tmcgilchrist closed 2 years ago
Hi!
There are no issues with these two releases and they are functionally the same as the 1.0.0 published on opam.
0.9.1 isn’t on opam as that just contained a package-metadata change needed for the npm package for use with buckle script. 0.9.0 isn’t on opam as I was initially waiting for some real world use to test out a few changes, and then ended up cutting a 1.0.0 release (available on opam) which is functionally identical to 0.9.1.
Thanks for the answer, I'll just use 1.0.0
Sounds good! I'd indeed recommending 1.0.0 if the requirement of needing dune >= 2.7 is acceptable.
Neither 0.9.0 or 0.9.1 from https://github.com/anuragsoni/routes/releases appear in opam packages. Were there issues with those 2 versions?