Closed ocehugo closed 4 years ago
@ggalibert, I think @lbesnard is waiting your :+1: on that to merge
@lbesnard , this became a very simple commit since I removed some refactorign not needed.
@ggalibert - there is only a case here that may break a workflow - for very simple processing streams (no ddb and no PP/QC runs), the filenames only get creation dates since time_deployment is empty (but not time_coverage).
I'm just wondering if this is someone workflow outside of us simply testing the export to netcdf functionality.
This move the filename conventions to use the
time_deployment
fields isntead oftime_coverage
fields.@ggalibert , please check if this is what you had in mind in #541