Hi Bene,
I was investigating some cases where biomass is missing from our fish m1 endpoints today and have found a number of errors, which I had though we had fixed.
Classes which don’t belong in m1 endpoint:
Phaeophyceae
Florideophyceae
Bacillariophyceae
Echinoidea
Gastropoda
Asteroidea
I’m unsure if this is a species id issue as as the Phaeophyceae observations appear to have a size class even though they are seaweed observations
Missing biomass for observations even though the a’s and b’s are in the database and the observations have a size class and abundance:
More than 12,000 observations from class Teleosti,Actinopterygii, Actinopteri, Elasmobranchii Could you please tell me if I’m correct ASAP i.e. if you get the same answers as this is a matter of relative importance.
Classes that aren't M1 fish species are displayed in M1 endpoint because they have been recorded (and ingested) as M1. Should be corrected by data officer
Missing biomass values: after investigation in the DB, missing biomass values where either due to missing cf value or null size class. Missing cf values have been fixed manually by Lizzie. Records missing size class should be fixed by data officer using the correction tool
From Lizzi email 2023-11-21:
Hi Bene, I was investigating some cases where biomass is missing from our fish m1 endpoints today and have found a number of errors, which I had though we had fixed. Classes which don’t belong in m1 endpoint: Phaeophyceae Florideophyceae Bacillariophyceae Echinoidea Gastropoda Asteroidea
I’m unsure if this is a species id issue as as the Phaeophyceae observations appear to have a size class even though they are seaweed observations
Missing biomass for observations even though the a’s and b’s are in the database and the observations have a size class and abundance: More than 12,000 observations from class Teleosti,Actinopterygii, Actinopteri, Elasmobranchii Could you please tell me if I’m correct ASAP i.e. if you get the same answers as this is a matter of relative importance.