Closed eggohito closed 2 years ago
Should we follow the technical distinction of "block items" being "items", or would it be preferrable to create a new prevent_block_placement
power type instead, in order to keep in line with what a regular MC user considers a "block"?
I'd say the latter would be better, just to be safe
This has now been superseded by https://github.com/apace100/apoli/pull/54, which adds a new prevent_block_place
power type
This PR makes the
prevent_item_use
power type work on preventing 'usage' and 'placement' of block items. It also adds a newinclude_block_items
boolean field that has a default value offalse
to keep the initial behavior of the power type