Open ddanielr opened 4 months ago
The 'tserver.cache.manager.class' property is also used by the RFileScanner in the client, so the property it not actually tserver specific. Do we need to support different block cache manager implementations between the client, tserver, and scan server? If not, then we should just make this a generic property.
Describe the bug When trying to set the class to use for the cache manager, the scan servers do not use a
sserver
property prefix. Instead the scan servers only load in a different manager iftserver.cache.manager.class
is set.Versions (OS, Maven, Java, and others, as appropriate):
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior (or a link to an example repository that reproduces the problem):
sserver.cache.manager.class=test.example
in the property file.tserver.cache.manager.class=test.example
Expected behavior The scan server should use the
sserver
prefix when loading in instance properties.Additional context There may be additional properties that are still only loaded in via the
tserver
prefix.