Closed eladkal closed 1 year ago
apache/airflow:slim-2.6.2-python3.11
with
apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==7.1.0rc1
on a kubernetes-sigs/kind
KubernetesResourceOperator - KubernetesDeleteResourceOperator & KubernetesCreateResourceOperator (#29930):
:ok_hand:
Verified that my changes in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31201 and https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31849 are included in the RCs and that they look good. Tested both with corresponding example DAGs and they yield expected results ✅
Thank you for including this! 🙂
apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark==4.1.1rc1
. ✅
Thank you! 🖖🏼
Verified my change in #31574 is included in the RC and working.
Thank you.
Tested #31765 works as expected.
Can we include #31783 in this release @eladkal @phanikumv?
JiraOperator (#31672) works like a charm, thanks !
good for me 👍
Tested apache-airflow-providers-discord==3.3.0rc1 ✅
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31171 is good to go!
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31482 works as expected and we have successfully tested other providers using our sample DAGs without any issues.
Can we include #31783 in this release @eladkal @phanikumv?
This PR is not merged yet. Once it's merged it will be released in a the following wave
Tested #30279, #31685, #31081,#31317 , #31249, #31758 as part of below RC and they are working as expected.
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.2.0rc1 pip install apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy==3.5.1rc1 pip install apache-airflow-providers-google==10.2.0rc1
please remove https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31338 it is not working as expected, I just pushed up a fix for it
please remove https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31338 it is not working as expected, I just pushed up a fix for it
We can not remove. The choices are cancel RC1 and cut RC2 or release anyway. Assuming this is the only issue I prefer to release anyway since this is a new small enhancement which won't cause any user pain if it's not working as expected. I will cut a followup release for the google provider with the fix as soon as this wave is released.
Tested #31207, https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31207 #31359 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31359 #30698 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30698 and they are working as expected.
Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:31 AM eladkal @.***> wrote:
please remove #31338 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31338 it is not working as expected, I just pushed up a fix for it
We can not remove. The choices are cancel RC1 and cut RC2 or release anyway. Assuming this is the only issue I prefer to release anyway since this is a new small enhancement which won't cause any user pain if it's not working as expected. I will cut a followup release for the google provider with the fix as soon as this wave is released.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32030#issuecomment-1602054263, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADDLAHNDYBA6G5EMZJ56FO3XMPNT5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAZNI7N2Y . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30244, https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30865 and https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30945 looks good. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31703 We reverted in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31985. So all good. thank you!
I tested:
I cannot test https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31991 because I don't have a GCP setup, but it's present in the release and it should work according to the GCP documentation
Checked if #27264 , #31983 , #31780, #31984 are included. All looks good.
validated #31659, looks good
Body
I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release. Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?
Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.
Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:
Provider amazon: 8.2.0rc1
BatchSensor
(#30279): @phanikumvdeferrable
param inEmrContainerSensor
(#30945): @pankajastrowait_for_completion
fromEcsRegisterTaskDefinitionOperator
andEcsDeregisterTaskDefinitionOperator
(#31884): @vandonr-amzProvider apache.hive: 6.1.1rc1
Provider apache.livy: 3.5.1rc1
LivyOperator
(#31685): @phanikumvProvider apache.spark: 4.1.1rc1
Provider atlassian.jira: 2.1.1rc1
Provider cncf.kubernetes: 7.1.0rc1
Provider databricks: 4.3.0rc1
DatabricksSubmitRunOperator
: Fix type annotation forlibraries
param (#31888): @phanikumvProvider discord: 3.3.0rc1
DiscordNotifier
(#31273): @vargacypherProvider google: 10.2.0rc1
BaseSQLToGCSOperator
(#31831): @hussein-awalacacheControl
field to google cloud storage (#31338): @ying-wpreserveAsciiControlCharacters
tosrc_fmt_configs
for GCStoBQ (#31643): @nathadfieldGCSUploadSessionCompleteSensor
(#31081): @phanikumvDataprocSubmitJobOperator
(#31317): @phanikumvBigQueryInsertJobOperator
(#31249): @phanikumvBigQueryCheckOperator
(#31758): @phanikumvProvider hashicorp: 3.4.1rc1
userpass
andaws_iam
methods (#31593): @hussein-awalaProvider jdbc: 4.0.0rc1
Provider microsoft.azure: 6.1.2rc1
Provider microsoft.mssql: 3.4.1rc1
Provider mysql: 5.1.1rc1
Provider odbc: 4.0.0rc1
Provider pagerduty: 3.3.0rc1
Provider smtp: 1.2.0rc1
Provider snowflake: 4.2.0rc1
The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in
Verify providers by contributors
All users involved in the PRs: @o-nikolas @utkarsharma2 @phanikumv @nathadfield @simonprydden @vargacypher @svdimchenko @longslvr @dstandish @uranusjr @dimonchik-suvorov @vincbeck @melugoyal @eladkal @Joffreybvn @sunank200 @moiseenkov @pankajastro @potiuk @killua1zoldyck @hussein-awala @raphaelauv @enchant3dmango @Lee-W @Adaverse @vandonr-amz @syedahsn @ying-w @bkossakowska @VladaZakharova @mahammi @pankajkoti @pgagnon
Committer