I'm filing this after a conversation with @paleolimbot about support for working with Arrow memory on Win32 and they suggested I file an issue to track adding an automated way to verify nanoarrow builds and works on Win32 with MSVC. As of writing this, I'm not sure Arrow C++ builds on Win32 (see https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32111) and it seems like nanoarrow might be an good alternative for users on Win32 that need basic support for working with Arrow memory.
Adding an automated test to CI or possibly just into the release verification script would be a good way to make sure nanoarrow works on Win32 and stays that way.
I'm filing this after a conversation with @paleolimbot about support for working with Arrow memory on Win32 and they suggested I file an issue to track adding an automated way to verify nanoarrow builds and works on Win32 with MSVC. As of writing this, I'm not sure Arrow C++ builds on Win32 (see https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32111) and it seems like nanoarrow might be an good alternative for users on Win32 that need basic support for working with Arrow memory.
Adding an automated test to CI or possibly just into the release verification script would be a good way to make sure nanoarrow works on Win32 and stays that way.