Users of this library may want to create their own builder types in order to experiment with new API shapes, or to support features that are currently not supported by the library. With minimal changes to the shape of the API, users can now extend the make_builder.
I am experimenting with how to handle union types for some dynamic data. As #6349 lays out, there is currently no support for unions underneath structs. That left me in a somewhat desperate situation whereby I was copying out the logic of make_builder in order to add one more case. Instead, with this change I can reuse the existing logic and intercept it as needed.
Users of this library may want to create their own builder types in order to experiment with new API shapes, or to support features that are currently not supported by the library. With minimal changes to the shape of the API, users can now extend the make_builder.
Which issue does this PR close?
Relates to https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6349
Rationale for this change
I am experimenting with how to handle union types for some dynamic data. As #6349 lays out, there is currently no support for unions underneath structs. That left me in a somewhat desperate situation whereby I was copying out the logic of
make_builder
in order to add one more case. Instead, with this change I can reuse the existing logic and intercept it as needed.Are there any user-facing changes?
No APIs are harmed in this change.