Closed raulcd closed 1 week ago
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit aa26f28a64b7638f01756d78a2ea8fbddceafc65.
There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉
The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 27 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.
Rationale for this change
Currently
from_buffers
is not working with StringView on Python because we validate against num_buffers. This only take into account the mandatory buffers but does not take into account the variadic_spec that can be present for both string_view and binary_viewWhat changes are included in this PR?
Take into account whether the type contains a variadic_spec for the non-mandatory buffers and only check lower_bound number of buffers.
Are these changes tested?
Yes, I've added a couple of tests.
Are there any user-facing changes?
We are exposing a new method on the Python DataType.
has_variadic_buffers
which tells us whether the number of buffers expected is only lower-bounded by num_buffers.