Closed squakez closed 3 months ago
@lburgazzoli I've addressed the metadata
properties. As mentioned for the other concern, although it's valid I think it is not relevant to this PR and will have to be solved regardless of this. Let me know if you have any objection to merge, so I can start the related work on the operator side.
Is it planned to backport to 3.2.x / 3.6.x for backward compatibility ?
This idea in general is good as the description says, so +1.
Is it planned to backport to 3.2.x / 3.6.x for backward compatibility ?
No. The compatibility will be managed at runtime, ie, 3.2 runtime mechanism will work in its own way, according to its spec. The operator will still have to handle (and deprecated as illustrated in https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/5251/files#diff-22dc2842d3dc75fd50c5856a16c240e8c17dc3f9785d8ab14dc6eb6a990134beR70) also the older approach which will eventually disappear after deprecation policy has expired.
With this PR we enrich the catalog and let certain runtime aspects to be managed via properties (with something similar to this draft [1]). Together with a work on the operator, we'll be able to simplify the management of runtimes and offload the specific runtime aspects, being able to delegate this to the runtime directly. The result of this PR will enrich 3.8.0 future catalog as following:
Eventually any other runtime (ie Springboot) should be adding the specific capabilities accordingly and it would be transparent for the operator.
[1] https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/5251
Release Note