Open joschi36 opened 4 years ago
@joschi36 Are you still considering this? please add configuration examples of what you want to achieve on the backend(s) with your new parameters, and a matrix of parameter <-> results. I think it might be a good idea but it is a bit vague as you describe it so far.
@DaanHoogland this should be fixed by #4141
ah right, can you check the PR, @joschi36 ? if this satisfies your request we'll close this when merged.
Yes this satisfies the request. Can't wait to see this merged 😃
Moving this to 4.17 as PR is moved to 4.17 milestone
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
CLOUDSTACK VERSION
CONFIGURATION
SUMMARY
Our Problem is that the default TCP timeouts aren't working for some of our usecases.
First Idea
The idea is to add three custom timeout parameter to the
createLoadBalancer
method.timeout connect
timeout client
timeout server
Second Idea
The second idea is to take a custom parameter to extend the
listen
section in haproxy. This custom parameter would be an array of configuration strings which get validated with haproxy configtest.Here the parameter matrix for haproxy 1.7 https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#4.1