Closed DaanHoogland closed 1 week ago
thanks @DaanHoogland for your investigation it is great you found the root cause !
I did a quick search on the code, it looks like the issue is caused by
(the parameter false
may should be forSystemVms
)
forSystemVms
thanks @weizhouapache that does sound like a much better and more generic place to make sure the flag is set. I'll revert my changes here and apply your suggestion.
@blueorangutan package
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 10049
@blueorangutan package
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10054
@blueorangutan package
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10059
@blueorangutan test alma9 kvm-alma9
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (alma9 mgmt + kvm-alma9) has been kicked to run smoke tests
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10560) Environment: kvm-alma9 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server a9 Total time taken: 47152 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9281-t10560-kvm-alma9.zip Smoke tests completed. 131 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
---|
Description
This PR
Fixes: #9275
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?