Closed nvazquez closed 2 months ago
@blueorangutan package
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Attention: Patch coverage is 15.05376%
with 237 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 15.76%. Comparing base (
679ce1a
) to head (daec7bc
). Report is 4 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10893
@blueorangutan ui
@nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
UI build: :heavy_check_mark: Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/9619 (QA-JID-436)
@blueorangutan test
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11274) Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8 Total time taken: 49550 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9619-t11274-kvm-ol8.zip Smoke tests completed. 139 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
---|
@nvazquez do we also need changes to deployment planner (orchestration), so VM deployment plan/planning considers arch of the iso/template against that of the cluster & hosts?
@blueorangutan package
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 10939
@blueorangutan package
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 10940
@nvazquez can you merge latest main and address conflicts? Thanks.
@blueorangutan package
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10956
@blueorangutan test
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11346) Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8 Total time taken: 53001 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9619-t11346-kvm-ol8.zip Smoke tests completed. 138 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
---|---|---|---|
test_02_unsecure_vm_migration | Error |
447.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py |
test_04_nonsecured_to_secured_vm_migration | Error |
448.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py |
@nvazquez can you check/fix the lint issue & kick packaging. After that this should mergeable, pending no other issues.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10990
Thanks @rohityadavcloud - fixed
@blueorangutan package
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10997
@blueorangutan package
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11012
Minor conflict (no need for repackaging though), pl address @nvazquez
@blueorangutan test
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
cc @nvazquez hope I haven't screwed up 🤞 the merge conflict
@blueorangutan package
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11016
@blueorangutan test
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
@blueorangutan package
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11386) Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8 Total time taken: 55615 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9619-t11386-kvm-ol8.zip Smoke tests completed. 137 look OK, 1 have errors, 2 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
---|---|---|---|
test_mount_shared_fs | Failure |
93.24 | test_sharedfs_lifecycle.py |
test_resize_shared_fs | Error |
0.23 | test_sharedfs_lifecycle.py |
all_test_network | Skipped |
--- | test_network.py |
all_test_nic_adapter_type | Skipped |
--- | test_nic_adapter_type.py |
Description
This PR introduces the multi-arch zones, allowing users to select the VM arch upon deployment.
Multi-arch zone support in CloudStack can allow admins to mix x86_64 & arm64 hosts within the same zone with the following changes proposed:
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?