Open jayzhan211 opened 6 months ago
I would like to work on this.
As I mentioned here https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7845#issuecomment-2073675288, the most useful thing for me would be less ugly errors when you do try to compare a union with something else.
Also it would be good to be able to force people to cast unions in my case, so it would be nice if we could switch off comparison_coercion
somehow.
@vaibhawvipul if you're working on this, you might be interested in my logic in datafusion-contrib/datafusion-functions-json/src/common_union.rs
As I mentioned here #7845 (comment), the most useful thing for me would be less ugly errors when you do try to compare a union with something else.
Also it would be good to be able to force people to cast unions in my case, so it would be nice if we could switch off
comparison_coercion
somehow.@vaibhawvipul if you're working on this, you might be interested in my logic in
datafusion-contrib/datafusion-functions-json/src/common_union.rs
This was helpful @samuelcolvin. Thank you.
My approach is similar -
union_extract
.take
I opened a PR that adds support for Union datatype on sqlparser which I hope can help here. If so, some review would be very appreciated, since sqlparser-rs dev-bandwith is a bit limited. Thanks 🙏
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
We have recently issues show that it is time to support
Union
10161 #10139
ScalarValue::iter_to_array
10180
comparison_coercion
I think the first step is able to create
Union
in slt file.Describe the solution you'd like
Follow DuckDB
Union
or others well-known system.https://duckdb.org/docs/sql/data_types/union.html
First step might be able to create table with union type
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
ScalarUDFImpl