We also need similar support for LargeBinary and LargeUtf8 types
Describe the solution you'd like
Please remember to create a PR that targets the string-view branch (not main)
In order to improve performance of these queries we will need the ability to actually compare StringViewArrays to constant values (and likely to each other)
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10918,
[StringViewArray
](https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/array/type.StringViewArray.html) support in DataFusion@Weijun-H added support for
<>
and!=
forStringView
in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10985 and @PsiACE added support forBinaryView
in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11004We also need similar support for
LargeBinary
andLargeUtf8
typesDescribe the solution you'd like
Please remember to create a PR that targets the string-view branch (not main)
In order to improve performance of these queries we will need the ability to actually compare
StringViewArrays
to constant values (and likely to each other)Thus I would like to be able to run
LargeUtf8 = StringView
StringView = LargeUtf8
LargeBinary = BinaryView
BinaryView = LargeBinary
Describe alternatives you've considered
I think you can follow the model in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11004 and simply extend the tests to have another column of
LargeString
andLargeBinary
Additional context
No response