Open samuelcolvin opened 1 month ago
I think the expectation for PERCENTILE_CONT
is that it will implement an exact calculation -- and to do so the implementation needs to keep all the actual values (e.g. the same way MEDIAN works).
So in other words, I think aliasing PERCENTILE_CONT
to the approximate version would be confusing to anyone who actually needed the real value 🤔
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
See https://github.com/pydantic/logfire/issues/433, it would be great to have a
percentile_cont
function available in DF that performed similarly to the postgres function of the same name.Would it be appropriate/reasonable to simply alias
approx_percentile_cont
aspercentile_cont
? I've ready #1539, but I'm not familiar enough with the behaviour to know if it makes sense.Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally the "fix" is as simple as adding an alias?
Describe alternatives you've considered
we could add the alias just in our code, but I'd love to hear whether @Dandandan @domodwyer @alamb think that makes sense?
Additional context
I also mentioned the need for
WITHIN GROUP
support in #11732.