Closed jayzhan211 closed 2 days ago
Comparing main and filter-chunk
--------------------
Benchmark clickbench_1.json
--------------------
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Query ┃ main ┃ filter-chunk ┃ Change ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ QQuery 0 │ 0.26ms │ 0.30ms │ 1.16x slower │
│ QQuery 1 │ 26.00ms │ 25.44ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 2 │ 55.35ms │ 53.21ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 3 │ 46.89ms │ 45.90ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 4 │ 307.76ms │ 309.23ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 5 │ 574.82ms │ 570.49ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 6 │ 26.30ms │ 26.27ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 7 │ 27.54ms │ 29.15ms │ 1.06x slower │
│ QQuery 8 │ 356.26ms │ 362.77ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 9 │ 546.82ms │ 557.03ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 10 │ 131.44ms │ 141.31ms │ 1.08x slower │
│ QQuery 11 │ 150.23ms │ 152.91ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 12 │ 614.05ms │ 610.26ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 13 │ 706.93ms │ 688.08ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 14 │ 566.77ms │ 547.21ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 15 │ 388.56ms │ 383.52ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 16 │ 932.13ms │ 941.68ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 17 │ 850.16ms │ 838.91ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 18 │ 2798.37ms │ 2790.18ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 19 │ 39.54ms │ 39.65ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 20 │ 707.81ms │ 702.99ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 21 │ 971.53ms │ 958.09ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 22 │ 2687.40ms │ 2676.42ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 23 │ 5810.42ms │ 5824.84ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 24 │ 410.33ms │ 385.74ms │ +1.06x faster │
│ QQuery 25 │ 396.73ms │ 405.53ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 26 │ 448.47ms │ 450.85ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 27 │ 1074.77ms │ 1038.62ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 28 │ 8169.84ms │ 7937.72ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 29 │ 348.52ms │ 355.17ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 30 │ 520.21ms │ 501.82ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 31 │ 528.27ms │ 525.37ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 32 │ 2780.65ms │ 2652.40ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 33 │ 2678.26ms │ 2671.76ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 34 │ 2572.40ms │ 2586.40ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 35 │ 526.14ms │ 529.53ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 36 │ 115.23ms │ 112.60ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 37 │ 77.91ms │ 79.28ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 38 │ 81.69ms │ 82.17ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 39 │ 203.75ms │ 207.33ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 40 │ 23.99ms │ 24.14ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 41 │ 22.93ms │ 23.93ms │ no change │
│ QQuery 42 │ 28.73ms │ 28.82ms │ no change │
└──────────────┴───────────┴──────────────┴───────────────┘
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Benchmark Summary ┃ ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ Total Time (main) │ 40332.13ms │
│ Total Time (filter-chunk) │ 39875.01ms │
│ Average Time (main) │ 937.96ms │
│ Average Time (filter-chunk) │ 927.33ms │
│ Queries Faster │ 1 │
│ Queries Slower │ 3 │
│ Queries with No Change │ 39 │
└─────────────────────────────┴────────────┘
I wonder if any of the queries in that benchmark uses aggregate filters?
Neither Q7, Q10, nor Q24 uses an aggregate filter.
Can we maybe find / create a query with filter? Maybe add one in clickbench_extended
?
Can we maybe find / create a query with filter? Maybe add one in
clickbench_extended
?
aggregate filter required postgres dialect, it might be easier to run benchmark with criterion
@Dandandan PTAL
Thanks @Dandandan
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?