182 enable a public construct with ByteBuf. However it might be making sense to avoid memory copy when people pass in a ByteBuf
Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
should-have
Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
FEATURE REQUEST
182 enable a public construct with ByteBuf. However it might be making sense to avoid memory copy when people pass in a ByteBuf
should-have
N/A