Closed jnturton closed 1 year ago
@cgivre, @vvysotskyi, @rymarm, @luocooong are you up for running this experiment for a while? It's trivial to revert but I personally feel there's a good chance that we won't want to.
@jnturton I think we should definitely run this experiment. I'm also curious as to how to run this with a specific PR from Calcite. That way I can contribute to the review process over there and find things that break drill quickly.
@jnturton I think we should definitely run this experiment. I'm also curious as to how to run this with a specific PR from Calcite. That way I can contribute to the review process over there and find things that break drill quickly.
They won't build and publish artefacts for unmerged PRs (would be a security problem) so we'll have to run our own Calcite builds for these. Probably the best is for the developer to pull the PR into a local branch and build Calcite putting the results in their local Maven repo, then build Drill.
Can someone do the formailty of approving so that we can give this a try?
DRILL-8412: Upgrade to Calcite 1.35-SNAPSHOT
Description
If we're willing to try basing Drill master on snapshot builds of the upcoming version of Calcite for a while then here's a PR to do that. Please see the related discussion in Drill and Calcite mailing lists this week for more information.
Important notes.
Documentation
N/A
Testing
Existing unit test suite.