Closed Suvendu-UI closed 4 months ago
Hi @Suvendu-UI, thanks for the PR and your interest in the project! We always welcome contributions.
I see this commit is for #447. We encourage discussion prior to opening PRs to help ensure alignment. Per the comments, we felt this issue needs more discussion before acting on a solution:
We do not necessarily want to manage version updates at the commit level. Is there a way to do this via commitizen or do we need an alternative?
I would love for you to work with us to find the right solution and help shepherd this PR through. I'll tag you in further discussion on the issue.
See here. I'm inclined to make this ticket just for commitizen.
Hey, @EandrewJones , how are you, i was looking for easier ways to commit the changes without much hecticness involved , i was googling it and got a automated ai which commits instantly which is almost equiv. to commitizen.
Here is the link https://github.com/christian-gama/autocommit
Hi Suvenda,
Flagon is very particular about its dependency footprint. We try to keep the tree as small as possible and only use well established tools. Committizen passes that bar, autocommit does not.
Moreover, we believe contributors should write their own commit messages. Commit messages should be concise, relevant, clear, and consistent in style. There's no need to try to add AI (extra complexity) for something as simple as commits.
Best
Evan Jones Website: www.ea-jones.com
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 2:14 PM Suvendu-UI @.***> wrote:
Hey, @EandrewJones https://github.com/EandrewJones , how are you, i was looking for easier ways to commit the changes without much hecticness involved , i was googling it and got a automated ai which commits instantly which is almost equiv. to commitizen.
Here is the link https://github.com/christian-gama/autocommit
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/apache/flagon-useralejs/pull/476#issuecomment-2214868434, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ2T6ANBDCRZXY2XXZYWRVTZLLJJNAVCNFSM6AAAAABKPPOZO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMJUHA3DQNBTGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hey @Jyyjy i think i have resolved the requested changes
@Suvendu-UI There's a tiny conflict that needs to be resolved before we can merge this. You should be able to:
master
package-lock.json
file, i.e. git checkout --ours package-lock.json
Pinging @Jyyjy for his final look over.
done all the steps @EandrewJones and @Jyyjy
@Suvendu-UI There's still a conflict on package-lock.json.
Are you sure you've pulled down the most up-to-date changes from the upstream repo, i.e. apache/flagon-useralejs
as opposed to just your fork (Suvendu-UI/flagon-useralejsGSOC
)?
I see you're working directly off master on your fork (not recommended, but okay for now). That changes the steps slightly.
To be more explicit:
git checkout master
git pull upstream master
where upstream points to the apache repogit push origin master
where origin points to your forkpackage-lock.json
. You should be able to resolve it by simply deleting the file, then re-installing npm install
.now all resolved i guess @EandrewJones
i don't know why but i am unable to pass the npm ci error , i have tried all the possible method reinstalling the package-lock and package file fsversion , can you help me?
i don't know why but i am unable to pass the npm ci error , i have tried all the possible method reinstalling the package-lock and package file fsversion , can you help me?
I just got a chance to look into this. I've never seen this issue before :exploding_head:
Let's try a few things:
You may need to delete the node_modules
and package-lock.json
, then using correct node version, try running npm i && npm ci
.
implementted commitizen easy to commit
fixed #477