Open journeytosilius opened 9 years ago
I guess you can judge for yourself: http://ngxpagespeed.com/ngx_pagespeed_example/ has a list of features which goes beyond minification.
If those are of value to you then I'd say it's not redundant.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:51 PM, chromafunk notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi Otto & Team. Cloudflare has now minify html / js / css, and js accelerator. Do you think it is still worth to implement both ? Or it is redundant ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pagespeed/ngx_pagespeed/issues/979.
CloudFlare's optimizer has some of the same features as PageSpeed, but as @jmarantz says, PageSpeed has several additional ones, including ones that are "pro-only" for CloudFlare like image optimization.
Ok ! I just asked cause left AWS behind and was inspecting CloudFlare. I will integrate both then :)
2015-06-17 19:01 GMT+02:00 Jeff Kaufman notifications@github.com:
CloudFlare's optimizer https://www.cloudflare.com/features-optimizer has some of the same features as PageSpeed, but as @jmarantz https://github.com/jmarantz says PageSpeed has several additional ones, including ones that are "pro-only" for CloudFlare like image optimization.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pagespeed/ngx_pagespeed/issues/979#issuecomment-112877564 .
We just implemented IISpeed (also a pagespeed module) with the free cloudflare for someone and saw a large jump on all pagespeed insight scores into the 90s, it took some tweaking. So you could see a lot of gain if your pages are suitable. YMMV.
Be sure to purge all your content on cloudflare, because old pages might be cached and you will not see any rewritten content.
So it is still ok to use both, right?
Yes, using both should be fine.
Hi Otto & Team. Cloudflare has now minify html / js / css, and js accelerator. Do you think it is still worth to implement both ? Or it is redundant ?