use commons pool2 instead of commons-pool

[lzysuqianqiu]

seata-all contains common-pool2 and commons pool ,better use one

[slievrly]

I checked it and found that commons pool was introduced directly and common-pool2 was introduced indirectly by jedis and dbcp2. But in any case, it is necessary to restrain the dependence to avoid a wider conflict, so I agree with you and you are more than welcome to participate in this.

---

我检查了一下，commons pool 是直接引入，common-pool2是被jedis，dbcp2间接引入。但无论如何，需要收敛依赖避免更大范围的冲突，所以我同意你的看法，也非常欢迎你参与到这里面来。

[wt-better]

pelase assgin to me

[wt-better]

我的本意是将版本统一到2.x，一方面是是间接依赖有依赖到2.x版本，不能exclude掉；另外一方面是1.x低版本应该升级到高版本，2.x高版本相比低版本，https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-pool/ 有如下陈述，在性能和可扩展性和监控上有了提升。

The Apache Commons Pool open source software library provides an object-pooling API and a number of object pool implementations. Version 2 of Apache Commons Pool contains a completely re-written pooling implementation compared to the 1.x series. In addition to performance and scalability improvements, version 2 includes robust instance tracking and pool monitoring.

但是经过测试, 相同的case，2.x版本相比1.x版本，性能反而下降了3-4倍

Test case： 4c 16G for 20 thread 1、pool.borrowObject 2、Thread.sleep(10); 3、pool.returnObject

所以需要决策下，是否统一版本到2.x

[wt-better]

另外我认为历史这里是销毁channel，应该是：invalidateObject，而非 returnObject ：

io.seata.core.rpc.netty.NettyClientChannelManager#destroyChannel