Restore the plain PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE

pan3793 commented 9 hours ago

Why are the changes needed?

From my review experience in the past few months, the contributors have less interest in filling the current rich PR template without explicit requests from reviewers.

Instead of keeping a rich template to ask the contributors to answer bunches of questions, I prefer to leave only the most important questions to keep the template clean and short.

How was this patch tested?

It's not a code change, it requires manual review.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

pan3793 commented 9 hours ago

cc @yaooqinn and other active reviewers @cxzl25 @bowenliang123 @wForget @cfmcgrady

codecov-commenter commented 8 hours ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (c391d16) to head (b1bbdd6). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #6821 +/- ## ====================================== Coverage 0.00% 0.00% ====================================== Files 687 687 Lines 42442 42442 Branches 5793 5793 ====================================== Misses 42442 42442 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚨 Try these New Features:

Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

apache / kyuubi