Good catch, then instead we can create actions using the replacements services: Natural Language Classifier, Dialog, Retrieve and Rank, and Document Conversion.
What do you think we use this issue to implement Dialog and create new issues for the other ones?
Thanks, yes, agree with you. Then maybe we can think of using of those created actions in a pipline to achieve some more complex apps, such as Q&A etc. Another solution is to utilize several Watson api in one action to compose a complex app, but in my opinion, the former one is more flexible.
@lzbj I agree that's we have sequences to create more complex scenarios, but we should have generic actions in a package that user can copy/clone and adjust and create their own sequence or trigger an event from inside an action to make a rule run with another actions
@csantanapr , could you please help create 4 issues with Package label, that associated with replacements services as you mentioned above and assign to me? thank you.
@lzbj I converted this issue to be for Dialog action, and created 3 more 587, 588, 589
Take into account that each one should have proper tests, and docs cover
I suggest to work on one first, this issue is already assigned to you, as you finish this one and is ready to pick the next one then assign at that time.
@csantanapr commented on Mon May 09 2016
We could use as an example the Watson Dialog API
@lzbj commented on Thu May 12 2016
@csantanapr ,could you please assign this task to me?
@lzbj commented on Thu May 12 2016
The latest recommended soluitons here: http://watson-qa-demo.mybluemix.net/ https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2015/11/11/watson-question-and-answer-service-to-be-withdrawn/
@csantanapr commented on Thu May 12 2016
Good catch, then instead we can create actions using the replacements services: Natural Language Classifier, Dialog, Retrieve and Rank, and Document Conversion.
What do you think we use this issue to implement Dialog and create new issues for the other ones?
@lzbj commented on Thu May 12 2016
Thanks, yes, agree with you. Then maybe we can think of using of those created actions in a pipline to achieve some more complex apps, such as Q&A etc. Another solution is to utilize several Watson api in one action to compose a complex app, but in my opinion, the former one is more flexible.
@csantanapr commented on Thu May 12 2016
@lzbj I agree that's we have sequences to create more complex scenarios, but we should have generic actions in a package that user can copy/clone and adjust and create their own sequence or trigger an event from inside an action to make a rule run with another actions
@lzbj commented on Fri May 13 2016
Yes, sure.
@lzbj commented on Mon May 30 2016
@csantanapr , could you please help create 4 issues with Package label, that associated with replacements services as you mentioned above and assign to me? thank you.
@csantanapr commented on Tue Jun 07 2016
@lzbj I converted this issue to be for Dialog action, and created 3 more 587, 588, 589 Take into account that each one should have proper tests, and docs cover I suggest to work on one first, this issue is already assigned to you, as you finish this one and is ready to pick the next one then assign at that time.
@lzbj commented on Wed Jun 08 2016
@csantanapr Thank you, yes, I'll do as you pointed out.
@lzbj commented on Fri Jun 24 2016
https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk/pull/641 @csantanapr , could you help review it when available, thank you.
@markusthoemmes commented on Fri Mar 10 2017
@csantanapr still valid/in the right place?