Open pjfanning opened 4 months ago
@He-Pin what do you think we should do here? Should we document the issue we see in https://github.com/apache/pekko-persistence-cassandra/pull/212 or is there a change we can make to stream-testkit to avoid the issue going forward?
I was expected to avoid a double evaluation, but that can only be done with 2.13, we may better go with 2.13 abd I expect drop the 2.12 support in 1.2.x anyway
@He-Pin This new method in https://github.com/He-Pin/incubator-pekko/blob/05248075bd13a336c9af079cb44a61986dc1f751/stream-testkit/src/main/scala/org/apache/pekko/stream/testkit/StreamTestKit.scala#L869 doesn't make sense to me. The PartialFunction is a Scala function, not a Java function. This seems like a not very useful Java API. The other changes in #1186 seem mainly ok to me but could we consider these?
When I say the other changes in #1186 are mainly ok, there are other new Java API methods that take Scala Partial Functions as inputs.
How do Java users even create a Scala Partial Function?
Yes, but a user can build a PartialFunction with the helper, such as the Receive builder.
Yes, but a user can build a PartialFunction with the helper, such as the Receive builder.
The ReceiveBuilder will not work for this stream-testkit use case. Unless we have a builder that can build a PartialFunction[Any, T]
- does that exist?
@pjfanning Yes, org.apache.pekko.japi.pf.PFBuilder
.
@pjfanning Yes,
org.apache.pekko.japi.pf.PFBuilder
.
Thanks - there seem to be some useful classes in the org.apache.pekko.japi.pf
package.
https://pekko.apache.org/japi/pekko/current/org/apache/pekko/japi/pf/package-summary.html
@He-Pin what do you think we should do here? Should we document the issue we see in apache/pekko-persistence-cassandra#212 or is there a change we can make to stream-testkit to avoid the issue going forward?
If I understand correctly this is only an issue when using Scala 2.12, right? In that case I think the note in #1403 seems sufficient and IMHO we can close this issue (or keep it open for if anyone is interested in looking into it, but remove it from the 1.1.0 milestone)
I'll close this. It is documented and I think the consensus is not to fix it.
see https://github.com/apache/pekko-persistence-cassandra/pull/212 there change that seems to have caused the issue is #1218 (and earlier #1186)