[X] I searched in the issues and found nothing similar.
Version
If it is possible, could #14814 be cherry-picked to 2.8? I tried applying the change to the 2.8 branch, and aside from a minor conflict on import ordering, it looks as if it would apply cleanly. This would allow 2.8 to run pulsar functions from the package manager.
Minimal reproduce step
Attempt to deploy pulsar function from package management.
What did you expect to see?
Success.
What did you see instead?
In the logs:
2022-03-23T07:00:52,589+0000 [worker-scheduler-0] ERROR org.apache.pulsar.functions.worker.FunctionActioner - public/default/1ib0g63yjm6hw Error starting function
org.apache.distributedlog.exceptions.InvalidStreamNameException: Invalid stream name : 'Invalid log name "/function://public/default/function@0.1.0" caused by empty node name specified @11'
at org.apache.dist…
Search before asking
Version
If it is possible, could #14814 be cherry-picked to 2.8? I tried applying the change to the 2.8 branch, and aside from a minor conflict on import ordering, it looks as if it would apply cleanly. This would allow 2.8 to run pulsar functions from the package manager.
Minimal reproduce step
Attempt to deploy pulsar function from package management.
What did you expect to see?
Success.
What did you see instead?
In the logs:
Anything else?
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?