Closed zrhoffman closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 65.77%. Comparing base (
26a2f6a
) to head (900cf16
). Report is 6 commits behind head on master.:exclamation: Current head 900cf16 differs from pull request most recent head 72834a2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 72834a2 to get more accurate results
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
+1 this idea, it would be better for the logs agent's permissions
After running Dev CIAB on the PR code, couldn't find the log files either at /opt/traffic_router/var or /var/log/.
The TR logs show up for me in /var/log/traffic_router
.
[root@trafficrouter traffic_router]# ls -l
total 76
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 10 18:52 access.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73560 Apr 10 18:55 traffic_router.log
[root@trafficrouter traffic_router]# tail -f access.log
They also show up for docker-compose logs -f trafficrouter
.
Also couldn't find the log file in TM container as well.
The TM logs are printed to stdout only with no files
This PR
changes configuration to log Traffic Stats to /var/log/traffic_stats instead of /opt/traffic_stats/var/log
so that the logs are on a different partition than the application itself.
## Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?
What is the best way to verify this PR?
If this is a bugfix, which Traffic Control versions contained the bug?
PR submission checklist