apang00 / Energy-Policy

0 stars 2 forks source link

peer review 2 #22

Open UofT-DailinLi opened 4 months ago

UofT-DailinLi commented 4 months ago

The repo's name needs to be completed; add a descriptive title for this folder, and remember there is no sign that this is a school paper. The folder is well organized.

README.md The README.md is complete. There is an overview section that also describes the function of each folder. There is also a disclaimer regarding the usage of LLM.

LLM the LLM text file is complete; there are conversations with the LLM model.

outputs/data/clean_data there are raw data and also cleaned data in the data section.

outputs/paper.pdf Title, abstract and introduction the title is well done, giving people a basic sense of what the paper is doing. The abstract is also well done, mentioning the motivation and the findings. However, the abstract should be concentrated and narrowed down to 4-5 sentences. The introduction ideally gives the audience the background and motivation for why they chose this topic.

Data in the data section, include an overview of the data and tell the audience where the data came from and how you processed the data. This may be helpful.

Results The result and models section needs to be completed,

Discussion the discussion section includes three different points and also includes a bias and weakness section. The discussion indicates this paper did not compare to other contrives, focusing only on Japan.

reference the reference section is well done and follows the requirements.

conclusion

Maybe include a conclusion section at the end of the paper and give people a high-level summary of the main findings of this paper.

outputs/paper.qmd graphs are all cross-referenced, and the code is clean and easy to read for the audience