Status Report

[johnrisko]

Hey guys, I am wondering on the status report of our progress on dividing the tasks to create reproducible code for the error diagrams. As shown on Github, our tasks are divided in the following manner:

Laura: Find out how etas.CI is given to us. Look at lines [25 - 27] in above R code.

Alyssa: Coordinate with the analyzer group 2 to homogenize the output for MDA model with the output for ETAS model we have now.

Tay: 
Given the earthquake data, divide them up to {times, magnitude}. 
Given start time and end time, get the period for them. 
[Lines 1 - 20]

Alice: 
Given you have training period, get number of training and testing set. Generate place holders for CI.dist and CI.list
[Lines 29 - 57]
Given you have parameters for ETAS model, and given you have the ETAS model, fill in CI.dist.
[Lines 24-27] [Lines 57-87]

Disi: 
Given you have parameters for ETAS model and given you have ETAS model, fill in CI.list, which is values at event time.
[Lines 89 - 112]

Bonghyun:
Compile Everything from above
Given you have CI.list and CI.dist, generate sorted list for error plot
[Lines 116-135]
Given error plot numbers, plot it to error plot.
[Lines 140-144]

John:
Given list of timeperiod, and the Error Points, make a function to get the Area Under the Curve.

I have the basic skeleton of how I am going to find the area under the curve and will update my code by Monday night. I think that we should all meet Monday and have this entire code done by Monday night. If you are traveling and don't have time to work on this until Monday, that's ok, but we should have all of our analysis done by class of Tuesday

[aparker92]

This is a good idea. Do you believe it is necessary to meet in person or would doing something online be sufficient?

[johnrisko]

I think if its possible we should all meet in person because this is the last week and we want to make sure everyone is on the same page. If you can't meet then online would suffice, but it will be better to have the meeting in person.

[aparker92]

Okay. How about tomorrow (Monday) at 3 or 4. This might not work for everyone, but if we can get a majority, that would be great.

[bonghyun5]

Wait scratch that. it looks like I do actually have to go to class for once tomorrow from 2:30 to 4.... lol. Could we meet at 4?

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Alyssa notifications@github.com wrote:

Okay. How about tomorrow (Monday) at 3 or 4. This might not work for everyone, but if we can get a majority, that would be great.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/aparker92/error_analyzers/issues/7#issuecomment-29587840 .

[lauraccunningham]

I can be there at 4 @aparker92

[johnrisko]

Ya 4 works. I have to leave at 5, but I can meet afterwards at 6.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM, lauraccunningham notifications@github.comwrote:

I can be there at 4 @aparker92

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/aparker92/error_analyzers/issues/7#issuecomment-29592233 .

[gnolnait]

I'll be there at 4. Engineering library right?

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:38 PM, johnrisko notifications@github.com wrote:

Ya 4 works. I have to leave at 5, but I can meet afterwards at 6.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM, lauraccunningham notifications@github.comwrote:

I can be there at 4 @aparker92

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/aparker92/error_analyzers/issues/7#issuecomment-29592233>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/aparker92/error_analyzers/issues/7#issuecomment-29592697 .

[aparker92]

Sounds good to me. 4 at Bechtel. I will also have to leave at 5. Can someone reserve us a room? It might be hard to fine a table with this many people and then we can talk more freely.

[GalaxyNight-day]

Can anyone connect the Skype for me? I'm in LA now so I cannot meet you guys in person...