search

apastsya / jcpnext4

0 stars 0 forks source link

JCPNEXT4-10: Verify that Process Doc definitions don't conflict with those in the JSPA #18

Closed apastsya closed 7 years ago

apastsya commented 10 years ago

Jira issue originally created by user pcurran:

The summary says it all. Since we're not modifying the JSPA in this JSR we must be careful not to introduce definitions that conflict with the equivalent definitions in the JSPA.

We need to conduct a review to verify this.

(Copied from JSR 358)

apastsya commented 10 years ago
apastsya commented 10 years ago

Comment created by heathervc:

Patrick will review and John Weir has volunteered to review the output.

apastsya commented 9 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

I've reviewed the latest version of the Process Document and found no conflicts. Where a definition exists in both the JSPA version has usually been copied directly into the Process Document. There are some necessary changes to accommodate the new membership classes, and in a couple of other cases the wording has been changed slightly without changing the meaning, but that's all.

We should keep this issue open to ensure that we check again before Final Release but as far as Public Review is concerned we're good to go.

apastsya commented 9 years ago

Comment created by heathervc:

We have verified this for now, go back and check again before Final Release before closing.

apastsya commented 9 years ago

Issue was closed with resolution "Fixed"