Closed apastsya closed 7 years ago
Comment created by pcurran:
See my last comment
Comment created by brunos:
It is much better, but I find this phrase very hard to parse... I checked with a couple of other people, and it seems to be confusing...
Today it is:
"If the Member whose representative is the Spec Lead withdraws from the JCP before the JSR is ap- proved the PMO shall request the preliminary Expert Group to choose a replacement."
Suggestions for improvement:
Just suggestions...
Comment created by pcurran:
OK: I changed to "If the Member who holds the Spec Lead position withdraws from the JCP..." in version 10 (not yet circulated, but will publish soon).
Comment created by heathervc:
verified as fixed. close.
Issue was closed with resolution "Fixed"
Jira issue originally created by user brunos:
In section 3.3.2, line 564 it says:
"If the Member contributing the Spec Lead withdraws from the JCP"
Although probably correct, this is a weird usage of "contributing", that conflicts with the general view of contributions in the document. Maybe we could change this to make easier to read?