search

apastsya / jsr348

0 stars 0 forks source link

JSR348-109: The current definition of consensus is too vague #101

Closed apastsya closed 7 years ago

apastsya commented 13 years ago

Jira issue originally created by user pcurran:

The current IETF-derived definition of consensus is too vague and needs to be tightened up.

This may be a usefuls starting-point: http://www.innatenonviolence.org/old/workshops/consensus1.htm

apastsya commented 13 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

We agreed at the September f2f meeting to strike the formal definition of the term Consensus and to replace it with the deliberately more vague term agreement.

We also agreed to add some general text in the Standing Rules document to clarify that the primary goal of reaching general agreement, and also to clarify that in the absence of agreement any member may call for a vote at any time.

These changes have been made, so I'm marking this issue as Resolved pending review and approval.

apastsya commented 13 years ago

Comment created by pcurran:

Closed, as agreed at the September 21 Working Group meeting.

apastsya commented 13 years ago

Issue was closed with resolution "Fixed"