Closed apastsya closed 7 years ago
Comment created by sean_sheedy:
Related:
815-817 - strike "except that Agents of JCP Members" as we decided that the PMO would be able to deal with election fraud (see 785-789 comment above.)
PC> And see my response above.
SS> Please strike this as the power to investigate as described above eliminates the need for this.
Comment created by pcurran:
I deleted "or if one or more Members are Agents of another Member" from "All JCP Members are eligible to vote in ballots for Ratified and Elected Seats subject to the provision that if a Member has majority-ownership of one or more other Members, or if one or more Members are Agents of another Member, then that group of Members shall collectively have one vote"
I added the following paragraph:
"If the PMO has reason to believe that an organization is attempting to influence the outcome of an election by encouraging its Agents to vote on its behalf it should take all necessary corrective action and then report the matter to the EC for approval."
Comment created by pcurran:
OK to strike the clause.
New para should read:
"If the PMO has reason to believe that an organization is attempting to influence the outcome of an election by instructing its Agents how to vote the PMO should take all necessary corrective action and then report the matter to the EC for approval."
Approved at September 29 WG meeting.
Comment created by pcurran:
See last comment
Comment created by pcurran:
Fixed
Comment created by pcurran:
Please make the changes suggested in the last comment.
Comment created by eduardo:
I have implemented it.
Issue was closed with resolution "Fixed"
Jira issue originally created by user sean_sheedy:
Process Document review
line numbers: JCP-2.8-21SEP2011-Redlined.pdf
785-789 - See comments on 54, above (filed as JSR-348-133). I thought we agreed to eliminate this in the NJ EC meeting by agreeing to give the Chair power to investigate and act on voting fraud as long as evidence is clear and this activity is put in the public record. I do not see that in this document.
PC> Good catch. Please log an issue so we don't forget this again. If you can make specific suggestions for changes in language that would be helpful too.