dplyr 1.0.8

[romainfrancois]

We're about to release dplyr 1.0.8 and it seems that the released version of photobiology has issues:

# photobiology

<details>

* Version: 0.10.8
* GitHub: https://github.com/aphalo/photobiology
* Source code: https://github.com/cran/photobiology
* Date/Publication: 2021-12-08 11:50:02 UTC
* Number of recursive dependencies: 60

Run `cloud_details(, "photobiology")` for more info

</details>

## Newly broken

*   checking examples ... ERROR

Running examples in ‘photobiology-Ex.R’ failed
The error most likely occurred in:

> ### Name: A.illuminant.spct
> ### Title: CIE A illuminant data
> ### Aliases: A.illuminant.spct
> ### Keywords: datasets
> 
> ### ** Examples
> 
> A.illuminant.spct
Object: source_spct [97 x 2]
Wavelength range 300 to 780 nm, step 5 nm 
Label: CIE A standard illuminant, normalized to one at 560 nm 
Time unit 1s
Spectral data normalized to 1 at 560 nm 

Error: 'trunc_mat' is not an exported object from 'namespace:dplyr'
Execution halted
```

• checking dependencies in R code ... WARNING

  Missing or unexported object: ‘dplyr::trunc_mat’

• checking re-building of vignette outputs ... WARNING

  Error(s) in re-building vignettes:
  --- re-building ‘userguide-1-radiation.Rmd’ using rmarkdown
  News at https://www.r4photobiology.info/
  
  Attaching package: 'lubridate'
  
  The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
  
      date, intersect, setdiff, union
  
  ...
  
      date, intersect, setdiff, union
  
  --- finished re-building ‘userguide-2-astronomy.Rmd’
  
  SUMMARY: processing the following file failed:
    ‘userguide-1-radiation.Rmd’
  
  Error: Vignette re-building failed.
  Execution halted

it seems however fixed in the dev version.

[romainfrancois]

It also seems to affect photobiologyInOut :

# photobiologyInOut

<details>

* Version: 0.4.23
* GitHub: https://github.com/aphalo/photobiologyinout
* Source code: https://github.com/cran/photobiologyInOut
* Date/Publication: 2021-10-11 04:10:01 UTC
* Number of recursive dependencies: 117

Run `cloud_details(, "photobiologyInOut")` for more info

</details>

## Newly broken

*   checking examples ... ERROR

Running examples in ‘photobiologyInOut-Ex.R’ failed
The error most likely occurred in:

> ### Name: colorSpec2mspct
> ### Title: Convert 'colorSpec::colorSpec' objects
> ### Aliases: colorSpec2mspct as.source_spct.colorSpec
> ###   as.source_mspct.colorSpec as.response_spct.colorSpec
> ###   as.response_mspct.colorSpec as.filter_spct.colorSpec
> ###   as.filter_mspct.colorSpec as.reflector_spct.colorSpec
> ###   as.reflector_mspct.colorSpec as.chroma_mspct.colorSpec colorSpec2spct
...
The following object is masked from ‘package:photobiology’:

    normalize

Object: source_spct [93 x 2]
Wavelength range 320 to 780 nm, step 5 nm 
Time unit 1s

Error: 'trunc_mat' is not an exported object from 'namespace:dplyr'
Execution halted
```

• checking re-building of vignette outputs ... WARNING

  Error(s) in re-building vignettes:
  --- re-building ‘user-guide.Rmd’ using rmarkdown
  News at https://www.r4photobiology.info/
  
  Attaching package: 'lubridate'
  
  The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
  
      date, intersect, setdiff, union
  
  ...
  Quitting from lines 525-530 (user-guide.Rmd) 
  Error: processing vignette 'user-guide.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
  'trunc_mat' is not an exported object from 'namespace:dplyr'
  --- failed re-building ‘user-guide.Rmd’
  
  SUMMARY: processing the following file failed:
    ‘user-guide.Rmd’
  
  Error: Vignette re-building failed.
  Execution halted

In both

• checking dependencies in R code ... NOTE

  Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ‘lazyeval’
    All declared Imports should be used.

[aphalo]

@romainfrancois It was easy enough in this case to remove the only call to trunc_mat() in package 'photobiology'. I have pushed the fix to GitHub. (The error in 'photobiologyInOut' was in a call to the same function from 'photobiology'.) When do you plan to submit 'dplyr' 1.0.8 to CRAN? How much time do I have to address other issues before submitting 'photobiology' to CRAN?

[romainfrancois]

Probably this week, or early next week.

[aphalo]

o.k., I will leave other changes for the next release. Thanks!

[aphalo]

'photobiology' 0.1.9' has passed CRAN checks and is now on its way to CRAN